Radiocarbon 14 dating shroud turin
Many books on the theme have been already published, but none of them contains such a quantity of scientific news and reports.
The most important of them is the following: the result of the 1988 radiocarbon dating is statistically wrong and other three new dating methods demonstrate that the Shroud has an age compatible with the epoch in which Jesus Christ lived in Palestine.
Many papers on it have recently appeared in important scientific journals.
Scientific studies on the relic until today fail to provide conclusive answers about the identity of the enveloped man and the dynamics regarding the image formation impressed therein.
It summarizes the results in a simple manner for the reader to comprehend easily.Rogers, Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of California) makes it perfectly clear: the carbon 14 dating sample cut from the Shroud in 1988 was not valid.In fact, the Shroud is much older than the carbon 14 tests suggested. No matter what any one of us may believe about the Shroud’s authenticity, we can no longer say that carbon 14 dating proves medieval origins; for the tests in 1988 were botched.They will wonder why protestations from experts in the Shroud’s chemistry were ignored.The will ask why documented data was not considered.